Smoking Should be Banned in all Public Places - UK Essays.
If smoking is banned in public places it safeguards the life of the smoker as well as that of the public. Studies have shown that second hand smoke kills. Second hand smoke causes sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), respiratory infections and asthma attacks in children.
Smoking should be prohibited in public places because it causes pollution, is disrespectful to others, and is dangerous to others due to secondhand smoke. Smoking in a public place should be prohibited. Public smoking is a large epidemic in the United States that needs to be stopped.
Smoking should be banned in public places for the health problems it can cause, the damages it can cause business owners,and the inconvenience it puts on customers. First, smoking causes numerous health problems to the smoker. Graham Jackson states, “.there is no such thing as safe smoking.
Many countries have banned smoking in public places including workplaces. The move came after many studies and reports suggesting severe health problems to passive smokers. I am of the view that the move is justified on the part of the government who are responsible for the health of their people.
Essay on Should Smoking be banned in Public Places. People go out to eat and out to bars to have fun and enjoy themselves, not to be put at serious risk or catching a possibly fatal disease. 0 billion people smoke all around the world. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body.
Yes, for instance, there have been bans on cigarette smoking in flights and advertisement on televisions with reduced outlets for smoking to help the public. Cigarette smoking should be banned. Cigarette smoking has led to increased health concerns even to the nonsmokers.
In view of this debate, this article will address the question whether smoking should be banned in public places. The smoker is the person directly linked with the risk of diseases in the act of smoking. However the smoker exposes the other people around him or her to the same diseases that may affect him or her.
Exposure to fumes can be just as unhealthy for a non-smoker as it is for the smoker. Smoking should be banned in public because people are exposed to hazardous smoke in many places, a ban can lead to prevention and quitting of smoking and second hand smoke can cause many illnesses and diseases.
Smokers, however, feel like it is a personal right to be able to smoke in public, and the smoking ban issue is important and personal for them. While this might seem like a new issue, this disagreement surrounding an action to ban smoking in public places has been around for a while.
I agree that smoking should be banned in public areas because it should not be allowed at all. It is an expensive drug that kills the user as well as innocent bystanders. Despite having special places for smokers in some public places, the smoke cannot be divided by a four feet tall divider or a couple of feet in between smokers and non-smokers in a forty by forty square feet room with a ten.
A ban on smoking in all public places would greatly decrease the health hazards related to smoking. We have a right to clean air and to a safe environment, smoking should be banned in public places for man reasons, including the fact that it is a hug health risk for both smokers and non-smokers.
The consequences of smoking are indeed very grave and hence there is an immediate need to ban smoking in public .The public opinion should be built in this favour and if required, the lawmakers of the country should enact laws, whereby smoking in public places is effectively banned.
So, the government should ban smoking at least in public places. In India, the government has already implemented this policy in some parts of the country. It has also strictly instructed that children below 18 years of age should not be employed in tobacco industries.
